Blog 15

                In chapter six of Dr. Pennock’s book, two hierarchical virtues of intellectual humility and courage were discussed and related to how scientists need to accept failure as a part of science. This includes admitting ignorance, subjecting oneself to the evidence, and being willing to have one’s hypothesis be challenged even if that means having it get proven wrong. However, since these are “ought” virtues and not what is reality, there are methodical systems in place to protect science and force scientists to follow a proper model to let natural truths be discovered. Though there are a few scientists that are not always humble or courageous and yet are still fantastic scientists, most scientists are able to truly flourish in science by being humble and courageous in order to have their curiosity be satisfied. An example of someone who was truly intellectually humble was Darwin. He always viewed himself as average and said that he was always astounded how someone with simple skills as his could convince men about something as important as natural selection. Though he lacked some intellectual courage as evidenced by his hesitation to publish The Origins, he never held himself higher than anyone else despite the success that he did end up having. This is an important lesson for scientists to learn today. Often, people view scientists as arrogant and overly assertive with their viewpoints which unfortunately some definitely are. This could be fixed though if scientists today remember to be humble by knowing that they do not know everything and that their views could just as easily be proven wrong and if it is, be willing to accept that as truth. This would in turn help all scientists flourish together.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 2

        The first eight chapters of Franklin’s Autobiography describe his early life through his travels and beginnings in Philadelphia. As I read through the autobiography, there were a few things about both Franklin’s characteristics and some of the situations that he went through that stood out to me. Franklin for the most part did not seem to complain about anything he’s was going through. He might have in person and there were a few disgruntled writings such as mentioning that he and the others that were heading for Amboy had been on the water for thirty hours with no food or drink; yet, his writing style and how he would switch to a happier topic showed that it really did not bother him. Often in today’s society, we find it so easy to complain about things since everything is nearly handed to us. When it is this easy for us to be warm and sheltered, well fed, and go nearly anywhere without having to walk the whole distance, we tend to get upset at whatever does not follow this
Read more

Blog 18

                Part two of the biography Albert Einstein: Ideas and Opinions described Einstein’s views of politics, government, and pacifism. All of the excerpts about Einstein’s views of these areas are very insightful and important to consider, the one that stood out to me the most and seemed as the best summation of his other accounts of pacifism was the section “The pacifist problem.” In it Einstein talks about people should not rely solely on the government to solve all sorts of problems and deny that the problem involves them in anyway. He goes on to state that it is a person’s job and right to stand up for their morals conscientious objection alongside other organizations with the same ideals, even if that means standing against one’s government. Darwin and McClintock demonstrated this kind of conscientious objection when both stood up for their research and fought for the truths of their discoveries to be made known despite the backlash they had to face from it. In this day
Read more

Blog 22

                Chapter eight, “Scientific Vices,” of Dr. Pennock’s book is about the importance of a scientist keeping their virtues in balance and not have it in too much or too little of excess in order to not have them become vices. He also discusses what certain virtues becoming vices looks like and the results of having these vices have on the scientific community or on one’s research. The main virtue of Dr. Pennock’s focus is curiosity since it is the pivotal virtue of all other scientific virtues. He shows the destructive effects of when curiosity becomes a vice instead, both mentally for the scientist and on science as a whole. The section that caught my attention the most was “the vice of excess curiosity.” Although the entire reference to Oppenheimer and his reflection on the Gita seemed miss placed in a section about curiosity becoming a vice, it still describes the point that focusing only on one virtue or allowing fulfilling scientific duty to swallow one’s life prevents
Read more