Blog 24

                Chapter seven, “Creative Conflict,” of Dr. Pennock’s book discusses the differing view points and stances on science between different groups, specifically science and religious groups. When talking about these view points, he puts them in context of different eras such as when both groups display dogmatism. He brings up the fallacy that both ends often used of using one’s authority or power to proclaim what is true, instead of letting the truth speak for itself. This again brings up the importance of the virtues of humility to the evidence and skepticism towards authority, not just for the scientific community but also the religious community. This shows that some of the scientific virtues are usable in other fields and are therefore fluid in a sense. This fluidity and shared characteristics may help bridge the gap between these two groups and allow for civil discord instead of authoritative notions and violent efforts, something that Dr. Pennock also mentioned is a fault of both sides that needs to stop. I think another thing that will help these two people groups coming to terms relies in being humble to the evidence. I don’t mean the evidence of truth brought forth from both sides, I mean that both groups should not generalize what everyone from each group believes in. Each person from each group is unique and has unique ideals about the world around them. We should not look at a small sector of each group and claim that as the majority; for example, when people look at Isis and claim that all Muslims are just like that. Recognizing that everyone from both sides has different view points of their own and then appealing to those shared view points will help religious and scientific groups work together.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 8

                I chose to read an obituary of the scientist Louis Pasteur, who died the 28 th of September in 1895. In the obituary, the cause of his death was described, a short biography of his life was given, and a recount of the state wide funeral held for him. Most notably though, the obituary discussed how Pasteur impacted science, especially with the medical field by laying a scientific foundation for it which moved it from the realm of pseudo-science to a factual branch of science. He accomplished this by not only debunking the theory of spontaneous generation but also by creating the first vaccines. One thing interesting with the obituary is the fact that his virtues related to science were somewhat directly described. Some of the characteristics mentioned were his passion and savant hood in science, his desire to learn as well as teach, and his work ethic. His characteristics are similar to others of high scientific standing to the point that in the obituary, he and his co
Read more

Blog 22

                Chapter eight, “Scientific Vices,” of Dr. Pennock’s book is about the importance of a scientist keeping their virtues in balance and not have it in too much or too little of excess in order to not have them become vices. He also discusses what certain virtues becoming vices looks like and the results of having these vices have on the scientific community or on one’s research. The main virtue of Dr. Pennock’s focus is curiosity since it is the pivotal virtue of all other scientific virtues. He shows the destructive effects of when curiosity becomes a vice instead, both mentally for the scientist and on science as a whole. The section that caught my attention the most was “the vice of excess curiosity.” Although the entire reference to Oppenheimer and his reflection on the Gita seemed miss placed in a section about curiosity becoming a vice, it still describes the point that focusing only on one virtue or allowing fulfilling scientific duty to swallow one’s life prevents
Read more