Blog 7

                In the articles about “Nicomachean Ethics,” Aristotle is trying to both answer and explain the question about what is considered good, what does good mean in terms of both internal goods and external goods, and how are these goods determined to be good based on what they are meant to be gained from a practice. He points out that good is different for each category of a practice, such as in medicine, in war strategy, and in the arts. Each of these goods are meant to be the end goal of each practice that a person is meant to reach for, often such things are pleasure, intelligence, honor, or wisdom. The main platform and in essence a universal good that Aristotle mentions is happiness; a happiness that is gained not only through one’s practice but also by spreading this happiness with others. Even though this is very lovely image and works well with what Aristotle later argues that a person that is happy from his practice will continue to do his practice in his best ability and will be able to persevere through difficult events, I do not entirely agree with his sentiment. Happiness is an important internal good that is shared in all jobs and practices, I do not think that it will always produce good effort from people and be gained solely from the other goods that Aristotle mentioned, mainly wisdom and betterment of virtues. Many people believe that the only form of happiness they will gain is through external goods and therefore will devote their energy to work towards these external goods instead of the internal. This could potentially produce a self-seeking motif in people and lead them to forget the importance of happiness in others. For example, someone who fakes data in a science lab that was developing a new pharmaceutical may gain happiness from the money they will generate, but this lack of true effort will cause many to be hurt. One could argue that Franklin and Darwin follow along the notion that Aristotle is making, yet I believe that the end good they were reaching for was above whether or not they were happy. There were many instances along their journeys where they were attaining the internal goods they were seeking yet were not happy. Personally, I think the universal good of practices relates more towards a higher purpose than happiness.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 8

                I chose to read an obituary of the scientist Louis Pasteur, who died the 28 th of September in 1895. In the obituary, the cause of his death was described, a short biography of his life was given, and a recount of the state wide funeral held for him. Most notably though, the obituary discussed how Pasteur impacted science, especially with the medical field by laying a scientific foundation for it which moved it from the realm of pseudo-science to a factual branch of science. He accomplished this by not only debunking the theory of spontaneous generation but also by creating the first vaccines. One thing interesting with the obituary is the fact that his virtues related to science were somewhat directly described. Some of the characteristics mentioned were his passion and savant hood in science, his desire to learn as well as teach, and his work ethic. His characteristics are similar to others of high scientific standing to the po...
Read more

Blog 24

                Chapter seven, “Creative Conflict,” of Dr. Pennock’s book discusses the differing view points and stances on science between different groups, specifically science and religious groups. When talking about these view points, he puts them in context of different eras such as when both groups display dogmatism. He brings up the fallacy that both ends often used of using one’s authority or power to proclaim what is true, instead of letting the truth speak for itself. This again brings up the importance of the virtues of humility to the evidence and skepticism towards authority, not just for the scientific community but also the religious community. This shows that some of the scientific virtues are usable in other fields and are therefore fluid in a sense. This fluidity and shared characteristics may help bridge the gap between these two groups and allow for civil discord instead of authoritative notions and violent efforts, something...
Read more

Blog 22

                Chapter eight, “Scientific Vices,” of Dr. Pennock’s book is about the importance of a scientist keeping their virtues in balance and not have it in too much or too little of excess in order to not have them become vices. He also discusses what certain virtues becoming vices looks like and the results of having these vices have on the scientific community or on one’s research. The main virtue of Dr. Pennock’s focus is curiosity since it is the pivotal virtue of all other scientific virtues. He shows the destructive effects of when curiosity becomes a vice instead, both mentally for the scientist and on science as a whole. The section that caught my attention the most was “the vice of excess curiosity.” Although the entire reference to Oppenheimer and his reflection on the Gita seemed miss placed in a section about curiosity becoming a vice, it still describes the point that focusing only on one virtue or allowing fulfilling scientif...
Read more