Blog 11

                In chapters five through eight in A Feeling for the Organism, the author talks about Barbra McClintock’s years at the University of Missouri, an overview of the development of genetics as a field and how McClintock fit in to that, her maize research at Cold Spring Harbor, and her discovery of controlled mutation in maize coloration through transposition. The chapter that stood out to me the most was chapter seven which discussed about McClintock beginning her work at Cold Spring Harbor before and during World War II. What fascinated me about it was McClintock’s thoughts on working there. It was the perfect place to grow her corn without any worries about departmental policies while also being a fixed job, something she was struggling to find. Despite all this though, she initially did not want to work there. Luckily she did since it was one of the few places during World War II that was not stuck as hard as other research labs. Yet, her attitude toward not wanting to work there was rather odd. The author stated that McClintock did not want to lose the freedom she had to do whatever she wanted and suggested she also did not like the seclusion of the place, which is understandable for anyone. However, this does not seem to line up with her personality described in the chapters before, especially since there was an entire chapter depicting her ability to be independent and work alone. I think it is mainly because of McClintock’s explanation of not wanting to give up her freedom. Having a free spirit to study anything is an important virtue for a scientist to have. Yet, as Dr. Pennock described in one of his chapters, a virtue can become a vice when it is out of balance, as I believe it had for McClintock. One should never have to study what someone tells them to find, but there does come a point when one needs to accept that being a part of an institution is a necessary commodity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 8

                I chose to read an obituary of the scientist Louis Pasteur, who died the 28 th of September in 1895. In the obituary, the cause of his death was described, a short biography of his life was given, and a recount of the state wide funeral held for him. Most notably though, the obituary discussed how Pasteur impacted science, especially with the medical field by laying a scientific foundation for it which moved it from the realm of pseudo-science to a factual branch of science. He accomplished this by not only debunking the theory of spontaneous generation but also by creating the first vaccines. One thing interesting with the obituary is the fact that his virtues related to science were somewhat directly described. Some of the characteristics mentioned were his passion and savant hood in science, his desire to learn as well as teach, and his work ethic. His characteristics are similar to others of high scientific standing to the po...
Read more

Blog 24

                Chapter seven, “Creative Conflict,” of Dr. Pennock’s book discusses the differing view points and stances on science between different groups, specifically science and religious groups. When talking about these view points, he puts them in context of different eras such as when both groups display dogmatism. He brings up the fallacy that both ends often used of using one’s authority or power to proclaim what is true, instead of letting the truth speak for itself. This again brings up the importance of the virtues of humility to the evidence and skepticism towards authority, not just for the scientific community but also the religious community. This shows that some of the scientific virtues are usable in other fields and are therefore fluid in a sense. This fluidity and shared characteristics may help bridge the gap between these two groups and allow for civil discord instead of authoritative notions and violent efforts, something...
Read more

Blog 22

                Chapter eight, “Scientific Vices,” of Dr. Pennock’s book is about the importance of a scientist keeping their virtues in balance and not have it in too much or too little of excess in order to not have them become vices. He also discusses what certain virtues becoming vices looks like and the results of having these vices have on the scientific community or on one’s research. The main virtue of Dr. Pennock’s focus is curiosity since it is the pivotal virtue of all other scientific virtues. He shows the destructive effects of when curiosity becomes a vice instead, both mentally for the scientist and on science as a whole. The section that caught my attention the most was “the vice of excess curiosity.” Although the entire reference to Oppenheimer and his reflection on the Gita seemed miss placed in a section about curiosity becoming a vice, it still describes the point that focusing only on one virtue or allowing fulfilling scientif...
Read more